I AM about to chill, but I want to demonstrate a fact of matter to you. A dude like T.D. Jakes, will run some shit like this to you all in theory and have you run to the bank and right back to him.
Use options and avoid consequences. When I beat my meat, it is an option, but a dumb ass drunk, well he became a drunk, because the man needed to nut, he was not-circumcised, so that hairy curly haired pussy hurt to much to penetrate. So he gets drunk. Uh! Then he finds him a punk, because he can penetrate ass? Then his a approach is, that ass was a consequence, until he wake’s up without his nuts.
Oh, T.D., oh, T.D., that is exactly what happened to me. See? That is who hangs out with T.D.? Oh, or he gets broke and spends all his money trying to buy pussy with his drunk ass, then at the end, he jerks off, but now it became a consequence.
Florida Laws on Miranda Rights – Probation and Parole Declaration – mp-3
Case History: NaQuila always was breading the boys hair, saying I always wanted a daughter. So he gets busting is school for acting out. People teased him, so he had to get a haircut. Now they want to rule his life, but not on my watch.
Prince Taytan
The Time Sensitive Conclusion. I might put Taytan in 917 and he goes into Home Schooling and no longer answers to those evil judges. They just want him there to find out about out home. But they did not read him his Miranda Rights and they cannot question him at all anymore.
Queen of Queens NaQuila – Your current assignment. Place him into home Schooling and he has enough money to learn to be a man. Then I might hook him up with a couple of Queens. By placing him down here or Joe has to step up. They have no right to ever again arrest my Son. He says to me in my house, my business this and that. But will travel all the way yo Sebring to answer to a white man? The conviction of all juvenal offenders are hereby overturned in Highlands County. And all my children will begin being home schooled. I need teachers. I need adults who can read, ASAP.
Jesus Christ in Brooklyn, New York
They do not read anyone their Miranda Rights in Florida.
They cannot question a child, even after they are arrested, until their parent (s) are present.
Therefore all children convictions are nullified.
The issue of school. Open a few of these churches and we are going to start placing our children in home schooling. They teach them lies in school and we can open out own system of education. Home schooling will mean they go to the assigned local church.
Home Education is a parent-directed educational option that satisfies the requirement for regular school attendance. Florida Laws protecting home education became effective in 1985. Parents have the freedom to determine their child’s educational path and the plan for reaching their goals.
The simple solution.
Getting Started with Florida Homeschooling
When you decide to homeschool a child in Florida, you must notify the school district superintendent of your intentions in writing. The letter must include names, addresses, and birthdates of the children who will be enrolled in home education and must be filed within 30 days of beginning the homeschooling process. The same process must be completed if you decide to stop homeschooling your children, and the letter again must be filed within 30 days of the termination of the home education program. You will also be required to have an annual educational evaluation of your child or children, which is to be performed by a licensed teacher within the State of Florida. If you are teaching elementary grades, an elementary teacher will be needed for the evaluation; and if you are teaching secondary grades, you will need to have the evaluation performed by a secondary teacher.
Home Education Requirements in the State of Florida – Regulations and Basic Operation
All children that are 6 years or older, or who will be 6 years old by February 1 st of the school year, are required to attend regular school until the age of 16 as a minimum requirement. There is a required attendance of 180 days of education for each school year, which can be achieved through teaching the equivalent hours of home education at your own discretion. While traditional school runs from August until May or June in most cases, you can teach your homeschooled children whenever you see fit, as long as you meet the mandated 180-day attendance requirement. You must maintain a portfolio of your home education program. This should include all lesson plans, reading materials, workbooks and other materials used during instruction. Also, you must keep a record of attendance and log the hours of education for each day, week, month, and year.
Miranda Rights is required for a Conviction.
Can a Police question a minor with parental Consent?
Nope. They cannot question without the consent of a parent or guardian. Practically speaking, this only means that any incriminating statements he made can be thrown out in a “Motion to Suppress Statements”.
Replied: 8/17/2011
Children and Miranda Rights.
That the police must take a person’s age into account when determining whether the circumstances of a case merit a Miranda notification. Because of their relative immaturity and lack of experience, children “cannot be viewed simply as miniature adults”. Minors may experience more acquiescence to authority, and so may require Miranda notifications in situations that would not trigger the Miranda requirement for adults. The police can arrest a child without informing the parent. However, the parent must be immediately notified by the probation office or prosecuting attorney. A child has the right to an attorney.
Florida Laws on Miranda Rights
Miranda Rights
Know your rights! The defense attorneys at The William Moore Law Firm offer years of legal experience. Contact our Fort Lauderdale attorneys for more information.
Both the United States Constitution and Florida Constitution provide that no person shall be compelled in any criminal matter to be a witness against oneself in a criminal interrogation and prosecution. Prior to any custodial interrogation, a criminal defendant must be warned of the following inherent rights:
1. the right to remain silent
2. that any statement made can be used against him or her
3. that he or she has a right the presence of an attorney prior to and during interrogation
4. that an attorney can be either retained or provided by the state
State v. Powell, 36 Fla. L. Weekly S264 (Fla. Jun 16, 2011): Reversed upon remand from United States Supreme Court, Florida v. Powell, 130 S. Ct. 1195 (2010) – Initially the Second DCA had reversed a conviction based on inadequate Miranda warnings (Warnings did not expressly state that defendant had right to have lawyer during questioning). The Florida Supreme Court agreed with the Second DCA. Upon granting Certiorari review, the United States Supreme Court granted the state’s petition and reversed and remanded the Florida Supreme Court’s decision (stating that “[t]he inquiry is simply whether the warnings reasonably ‘conve[y] to [a suspect] his rights as required by Miranda.’ ” Id. at 1204 (quoting Duckwoth v. Eagan, 492 U.S. 195, 203 (1989)) with a proviso that Florida may have more protections than the Federal requirements. Upon review the Florida Supreme Court adopted the higher court’s decision and found that Florida’s Constitution provided no further protections.
“As we have previously explained, however, our conclusions in Traylor [see below] ‘were no different than those set forth in prior holdings of the United States Supreme Court.’ Owen, 696 So. 2d at 719. Moreover, we find no basis for concluding that different pre-interrogation warnings are required by the Florida Constitution than are required by the Fifth Amendment. Because the United States Supreme Court has determined that the warnings sufficiently conveyed the right to the presence of counsel as required by the Federal Constitution, we find that the warnings were likewise sufficient under the Florida Constitution. Accordingly, we now conclude that the trial court did not err in admitting Powell’s post-Miranda statements into evidence.”
Id. at S266.
In dissent, J. Pariente urges law enforcement to come up with a standardized warning. Justice Quince dissents arguing that Florida’s Constitution does provide greater protections than the Federal government and because of that the Second DCA’s decision should continue to be affirmed.
The entrance into the Dance Studios with outside collaboration security requirements
The 5th Floor is a full size dances studios
The Location
On the Left side of S. Delaney is our temporary residence until Jesus Christ, Square is built on the right side of S. Delaney. Notice the red lines on the map. That whole block will become one major building condo type construction. And the back half of the left side of Delaney to Order of Zews will the residential home, also 5 stories and the are to be joint by an above ground level escalator.
Order of Move in:
The place is a mess, they kidnap me, then the rob my house knowing nobody is home. But they did not know I took out a $1 Trillion insurance policy out on it in the name of Jesus Christ and will settle for $200 Million and In think National Security will agree, God needs a place to rest his head and knowing his children are safe and free from all this evil exploitation.
My bees are patrolling the first floor, because if I move in they will die, once I seal the holes letting them in. But now the upstairs is free of bees and needs to be cleaned up. It has Wi-Fi and the signal strong. That is where the studio is going to be. It has a big bathroom once merged with the closet becomes a full bathroom and it is the walk in closet area. You really want me to design this? And in there alone they will just break in and steal my shit. I cannot live there alone anymore.
Jesus Christ Square
This is where we will build the Queendom Administrative Building and these photos map out what it will look like inside. Remember the size of that whole block, built 5 stories high.
We will use Robotic Construction Technology and build 5 stories condos using the construction style used in NYC High Risers. Plus, we will us arch technology as in Noah. We will literally build our homes to withstand 200 mph winds, by placing arch’s below and then basically build huge ships that are always docked.
The Barrack Obama Dilemma – The President of Constitutional Laws – mp-3
By: Rev. Frank Paul Jones – Messiah
Baker Act:The Florida Mental Health Act of 1971 (Florida Statute 394.451-394.47891[1] (2009 rev.)), commonly known as the “Baker Act,” allows the involuntary institutionalization and examination of an individual.The Baker Act allows for involuntary examination (what some call emergency or involuntary commitment). It can be initiated by judges, law enforcement officials, physicians, or mental health professionals. There must be evidence that the person:
possibly has a mental illness (as defined in the Baker Act).
is a harm to self, harm to others, or self neglectful (as defined in the Baker Act).
This law was waiting for me in Florida. I got here in Nov. 2009. Then was Baker Act over 30 times since being here.
Barrack Obama is a Constitutional Lawyer and this law is unconstitutional, as is damn near everything going on in America today.
Therefore, if this law is carried out under Obama Care, Obama Care too is unconstitutional, but he was billed as a Constitutional Lawyer?
394.4672 Procedure for placement of veteran with federal agency.
Is the Baker Act Constitutional?
Is the law of marriage constitutional?
Do the supreme Justice protections extend to the Family of the United States Supreme Justices? If yes. How do we protect the integrity of the courts, ?once your family is allowed to go beyond these legal boundaries?
Is God above the United States Constitution?
State of Florida v. Frank Paul Jones Case: #28-2016-MM
Constitutionality is the condition of acting in accordance with an applicable constitution;[1] the status of a law, a procedure, or an act’s accordance with the laws or guidelines set forth in the applicable constitution. When one of these (laws, procedures, or acts) directly violates the constitution, it is unconstitutional. All the rest are considered constitutional until challenged and declared otherwise.
Under Baker Act You Have No rights as a Citizen:
This is an easy one to solve. To lawfully Baker Act someone under this unconstitutional act to steal ones right to think as they place, practice their faith in God and it is even an end run to one’s rights under Miranda. When you are Baker Act, you are being taken into custody by law enforcement to be transferred to a hospital not even of your choice, but you are not being arrested under the law in the State of Florida, so the Miranda Rights is not acknowledged.
Violation of the 5th Amendment
You are being said to be a danger to yourself or someone else and it means homicidal or suicidal. And the main flaw is it is based on your own testimony, which is against the 5th Amendment right, you no longer in acknowledged as having anyway, because you do not require Miranda Right, meaning you have no rights as a citizen on this law. And the claim to take your rights, is that have ideas in your head to harm yourself or others, with is a civil action as punishment for even thinking about a criminal offense you never even tried too carryout. And even in civil court, you are subject to being found guilty by a preponderance of evidence at least. But under Baker Act, you go straight to lock down and two weeks later and bunch of shoots also, they say you feel better you can go home. Leaving you without any civil or criminal recourse. This is NAZI written all over it.
Baker Act is Florida Law & not Federal Law Enforcement:
The Florida Mental Health Act of 1971 (Florida Statute 394.451-394.47891 (2009 rev.)), commonly known as the “Baker Act,” allows the involuntary institutionalization and examination of an individual. The Baker Act allows for involuntary examination (what some call emergency or involuntary commitment).
RE: MENTAL HEALTH–BAKER ACT–UNITED STATES–LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS–VETERANS AFFAIRS–federal veterans’ affairs police officer not a law enforcement officer for purposes of Baker Act. ss. 394.462 and 394.463, Fla. Stat.
Federal law enforcement officers do not constitute law enforcement officers for purposes of Florida’s Baker Act, and thus possess no authority under the act to initiate the involuntary examination of a person or to transport such person as law enforcement officers.
The Martha Mitchell effect is the process by which a psychiatrist, psychologist, or other mental health clinician labels the patient’s accurate perception of real events as delusional and misdiagnoses accordingly.
Description
According to Bell et al., “Sometimes, improbable reports are erroneously assumed to be symptoms of mental illness”, due to a “failure or inability to verify whether the events have actually taken place, no matter how improbable intuitively they might appear to the busy clinician”.[1] They note that typical examples of such situations, may include:
Quoting psychotherapist Joseph Berke, the authors note that “even paranoids have enemies”. Any patient, they explain, can be misdiagnosed by clinicians, especially patients with a history of paranoid delusions.
Of note is how habitually patients are diagnosed as delusional when their grievances concern health care workers and/or health care institutions, even when the patient has no history of delusion. “A patient arriving claiming to have been injured by another health care professional is regarded as a crazy person who potentially could ruin the career of an innocent colleague.”[2]
It protects civil liberties and provides for the common defense. The Constitution requires the President and Congress to respect and defend individual civil liberties but also provide for the common defense. The Constitution weighs heavily on both sides of the debate over national security and civil liberties—it is important to recognize both factors.
Expectation of privacy is not unlimited. The Supreme Court has ruled that Americans enjoy a “reasonable” expectation of privacy; however, this is not an unlimited expectation of privacy. This means that anything one exposes voluntarily to the public—or even to a third party—is not considered protected. Congress of course can expand these rights (and it has repeatedly); however, these protections yield to criminal and national security investigations.
The law provides significant safeguards. The PATRIOT Act does not provide investigators with unfettered power to spy on innocent Americans. What it does do is ensure that national security investigators have the same tools at their disposal to investigate terrorists that law enforcement agents have to investigate and prosecute drug dealers and rapists. These tools come with significant procedural safeguards, oversight, and reporting requirements and are subject to routine and aggressive oversight by the FISA court and Congress.
It has passed constitutional muster. No single provision of the PATRIOT Act has ever been found unconstitutional. This is a testament to the act’s limited applicability, procedural safeguards, and extensive oversight mechanisms—as well as the fact that it often provides more protections than are afforded in criminal proceedings.
Disagreements over the role of government are different from actual abuse. Mere expansion of executive authority in the context of national security investigations alone does not in itself create actual abuse. Certainly, there are fundamental disagreements over the role of the executive branch during wartime. However, careful monitoring and vigilant oversight are oftentimes the answer to potential abuses of power—not all-out prohibition.
Following a lack of Congressional approval, parts of the Patriot Act expired on June 1, 2015.[5] With the passage of the USA Freedom Act on June 2, 2015, the expired parts were restored and renewed through 2019.[6] However, Section 215 of the law was amended to stop the National Security Agency from continuing its mass phone data collection program.[6] Instead, phone companies will retain the data and the NSA can obtain information about targeted individuals with permission from a federal court.[
The USA Freedom Act (“H.R. 2048”. , Pub.L. 114–23) is a U.S. law enacted on June 2, 2015 that restored in modified form several provisions of the Patriot Act, which had expired the day before. The act imposes some new limits on the bulk collection of telecommunication metadata on U.S. citizens by American intelligence agencies, including the National Security Agency. It also restores authorization for roving wiretaps and tracking lone wolf terrorists.[1][2] The title of the act originally was a ten-letter backronym (USA FREEDOM) that stood for “Uniting and Strengthening America by Fulfilling Rights and Ending Eavesdropping, Dragnet-collection and Online Monitoring Act.“.
Baker Act 2009 – I came to Florida November 2009 – What is the intent?
Fact: I was Baker Act perhaps 20 to 25 or even 35 times in the last 7 years here in Avon Park, FL. by a psychiatrist named Dr. Doris Borden, at the VA clinic in Sebring. I was even Baker Act out of a U.S. Post Office, under Federal Jurisdiction, by the County Sheriff Department, of Highlands County, Florida and then arrest after 36 days in a psychiatric ward, the next day, for going back to make a complaint to the Postal Inspector because the Van Duyn Family child Vicky Dunn said she owns that Federal Post Office, we the big bad Illuminati Duyn Family because I spotted Chelsea Clinton posing as fatty stealing my mail and shit. Now you understand how they use these unconstitutional powers to control the masses.
The Florida Mental Health Act of 1971 (Florida Statute 394.451-394.47891[1] (2009 rev.)), commonly known as the “Baker Act,” allows the involuntary institutionalization and examination of an individual.
The Baker Act allows for involuntary examination (what some call emergency or involuntary commitment). It can be initiated by judges, law enforcement officials, physicians, or mental health professionals. There must be evidence that the person:
possibly has a mental illness (as defined in the Baker Act).
is a harm to self, harm to others, or self neglectful (as defined in the Baker Act).
Examinations may last up to 72 hours after a person is deemed medically stable and occur in over 100 Florida Department of Children and Families-designated receiving facilities statewide.
There are many possible outcomes following examination of the patient. This includes the release of the individual to the community (or other community placement), a petition for involuntary inpatient placement (what some call civil commitment), involuntary outpatient placement (what some call outpatient commitment or assisted treatment orders), or voluntary treatment (if the person is competent to consent to voluntary treatment and consents to voluntary treatment). The involuntary outpatient placement language in the Baker Act took effect as part of the Baker Act reform in 2005.
The act was named for a Florida state representative from Miami, Maxine Baker,[2] who had a strong interest in mental health issues, served as chair of a House Committee on Mental Health, and was the sponsor of the bill.
The nickname of the legislation has led to the term “Baker Act” as a transitive verb, and “Baker Acted” as a passive-voice verb, for invoking the Act to force an individual’s commitment. Although the Baker Act is a statute only for the state of Florida, use of “Baker Acting” as a verb has become prevalent as a slang term for involuntary commitment in other regions of the United States.
Emergency Means Emergency not Survey looking for Food @ Mount of Deception
Baker Act Transport clearly states – There is no transfer of custody from State to Federal in Baker Act law
In summary, law enforcement is required to complete the front side of the mandatory CF-MH 3100 form titled “Transport to Receiving facility” for every individual on involuntary status. if the county contracts with a medical transport company for the primary transport of persons under the Baker Act, the law enforcement officer is still required to complete the form, but the back side of the form must also be completed by law enforcement and the transporter to document that the continued presence of law enforcement is not needed for the safety of the person or others.
7
No one except law enforcement has the authority to take a person against his/her will or without express and informed consent to a facility under the Baker Act unless there is a specific exception under the law. Only after an officer has determined a lack of dangerousness can the individual be “consigned” to the care of a medical transporter.
Q. I have read the statute on transportation and understand that once a patient is on a BA that LEO must be called to transport to our central receiving center. The question I have is #1. How is it that other VA Hospitals that have Community Based Outpatient Clinics (CBOC) can transport via ambulance to the VA hospital/mother facility? Are they going against the statute since the CBOCs are in different counties? Should they be calling LEO and sending those patients to the local receiving facility? And #2. If the above is possible, then what would we need to do transport a BA in our county to a VA hospital which is in a separate county? Would we require a Transportation Exception Plan that would permit us to use an ambulance to transport to the other county?
Only law enforcement is authorized to take persons against their will or without their informed consent under the involuntary provisions of the Baker Act. The officer can only decline to transport if one of the specified exceptions identified in the Baker Act is met. There are 4-5 counties in the state that have contracted (at the sole cost of the county) for medical transport of persons under the Baker Act. In addition, if an officer believes for the safety of the officer or person in custody EMS is required, the officer can request assistance – this often results in EMS conducting the transport. In any case, the officer is required to report to the scene and must complete the BA-3100 Transport form. The officer can assess whether medical transport is needed and if so, co-sign the back of the form with the medical transporter documenting that the continued presence of law enforcement personnel isn’t necessary for the safety of the person or others as required by law.
If other VA outpatient clinics around the state aren’t following the law, this should be corrected and shouldn’t be a basis for you to do likewise. The law requires that a person under involuntary examination status be taken to the nearest receiving facility. Your county has a legally sanction exception to this provision approved by the Board of County Commissioners and the Secretary of DCF that allows adults to be taken to the Central Receiving Center instead of the nearest receiving facility. This is the only legal exception that has been approved in your County. You can see the various exceptions approved around the state on page P-6 of the 2011 Baker Act Handbook.
You could seek another Transportation Exception Plan for veterans to be taken to a VA hospital once the law enforcement officer had completed the transport form. However, this isn’t a quick process and may not be needed by the time your new VA hospital is completed. For the time being, you may want to collaborate with the CRC to see if the transfer from the CRC to the out of county VA hospital can be expedited. You might want to investigate whether a “virtual” transfer might work, if legally sufficient to meet the requirements of the law.
One of the authorized reasons for a Transportation Exception Plan is for a “specialized transportation system that provides an efficient and human method of transporting patients to receiving facilities, among receiving facilities, and to treatment facilities” (see bottom of page 89 and top of page 90 in the 2011 Baker Act Handbook. This would
8
permit VA to arrange and pay for ambulance transport from your county to the out of county VA hospital if the law enforcement officer had completed the 3100 form with concurrence from the ambulance driver and the Board of County Commission/DCF Secretary had formally approved the Plan.
Q. The Baker Act appears very clear in its requirement that law enforcement respond to and transport Baker Acts. In our county, the Sheriff has instituted a policy in which they only respond to and transport violent Baker Acts. When Staff try to place a call to “911,” the dispatcher asks detailed questions about the individual being Baker Acted. If the dispatcher determines they are not violent at that moment, they instruct the caller to call non-emergency transport. We have attempted to explain the law to dispatchers, EMS, and law enforcement officers, to no avail. Once, a “911” dispatcher hung up on us. Our clinicians only initiate a Baker Act if the individual is mentally ill, an imminent risk to self or another, as a direct consequence of their illness and refusing voluntary treatment. We do not have the authority to physically restrain someone if they choose to elope. We continue to follow the law and call our local law enforcement agency when we Baker Act someone, but frequently struggle with this issue.
Then after all of this they found me incompetent to stand trial and I heard the issued out an arrest warrant and continued to Baker Act me. p-incomp-1p-incomp-2p-invol-incomp-order
They order me to an involuntary incompetence evaluation. I refused, because I was charged with a misdemeanor and they had no such authority. Then they had two psychiatrist claim I was incompetent, whom one I saw for less then 5 minutes and told him, I do not want to talk to you, because you just told me you are a psychiatrist and only a psychologist, can determine if I AM incompetent and only after the court prove I AM mentally ill. The court has no current medical records on me.
Self Preservation – The First Law of Nature
Everylivingthingwillfight to survive.; It is natural to think of yourselffirst.Whenfoe’sbestfriendwasarrested,Joepretendednot to knowhim.“Perhaps it wasn’tveryloyal of me,” he thought,“butself-preservation is thefirstlaw of nature.”
A neutron bomb, officially termed as a type of Enhanced Radiation Weapon (ERW), is a low yield thermonuclear weapon designed to maximize lethal neutron radiation in the immediate vicinity of the blast while minimizing the physical power of the blast itself. The neutron release generated by a nuclear fusion reaction is intentionally allowed to escape the weapon, rather than being absorbed by its other components.[3] The neutron burst, which is used as the primary destructive action of the warhead, is able to penetrate enemy armor more effectively than a conventional warhead thus making it more lethal as a tactical weapon.
Although neutron bombs are commonly believed to “leave the infrastructure intact”, with current designs that have explosive yields in the low kiloton range,[44] detonation in (or above) a built-up area would still cause a sizable degree of building destruction, through blast and heat effects out to a moderate radius, albeit considerably less destruction, than when compared to a standard nuclear bomb of the exact same total energy release or “yield”.[45]
The Effects of the Neutron Blast
Upon detonation, a near-ground airburst of a 1 kiloton neutron bomb would produce a large blast wave and a powerful pulse of both thermal radiation and ionizing radiation, and non-ionizing radiation in the form of fast (14.1 MeV) neutrons. The thermal pulse would cause third degree burns to unprotected skin out to approximately 500 meters. The blast would create at least 4.6 psi out to a radius of 600 meters, which would severely damage all non-reinforced concrete structures. At the conventional effective combat range against modern main battle tanks and armored personnel carriers (< 690–900 m), the blast from a 1 kt neutron bomb would destroy or damage to the point of non-usability almost all un-reinforced civilian buildings.
Using neutron bombs to stop an enemy armored attack by rapidly incapacitating crews with a dose of 8000+ rads of radiation[52] would require exploding large numbers of them to blanket the enemy forces, destroying all normal civilian buildings within c. 600 meters of the immediate area.[52][53]Neutron activation from the explosions could make many building materials in the city radioactive, such as zinc coated steel/galvanized steel (see area denial use below).
Because liquid-filled objects like the human body are resistant to gross overpressure, the 4–5 psi blast overpressure would cause very few direct casualties at a range of c. 600 m. The powerful winds produced by this overpressure, however, could throw bodies into objects or throw debris at high velocity, including window glass, both with potentially lethal results. Casualties would be highly variable depending on surroundings, including potential building collapses.[54]
The pulse of neutron radiation would cause immediate and permanent incapacitation to unprotected outdoor humans in the open out to 900 meters,[9] with death occurring in one or two days. The median lethal dose (LD50) of 600 rads would extend to between 1350 and 1400 meters for those unprotected and outdoors,[52] where approximately half of those exposed would die of radiation sickness after several weeks.
A human residing within, or simply shielded by, at least one concrete building with walls and ceilings 30 cm (12 in) thick, or alternatively of damp soil 24 inches thick, would receive a neutron radiation exposure reduced by a factor of 10.[55][56] Even near ground zero, basement sheltering or buildings with similar radiation shielding characteristics would drastically reduce the radiation dose.[57]
Furthermore, the neutron absorption spectrum of air is disputed by some authorities, and depends in part on absorption by hydrogen from water vapor. Thus, absorption might vary exponentially with humidity, making neutron bombs far more deadly in desert climates than in humid ones.[52]
D.B.A. Jesus Christ – The Only Living God
Message Approved By God Above the United States Constitution
DBAJesusChrist.org 